The question of the existence of evil came up in drunken midday conversation the other day. Keep in mind that the discussion of evil was based on the Christian idea of Satan and pure evil as a counter-balance and spoiler of good. My arguments here are in no way meant to justify the heinous acts of these historical figures. So much for the disclaimer, read on.
Someone finally asked me if Adolph Hitler was evil. I said his actions and motivations had to be considered in historical context (there's also his psychological profile to consider, but let's stick with the "created by his environment" argument for now).
That went over like a lead balloon.
But I still say that Hitler wasn't evil. He was cruel, ruthless, cold-blooded and a lot of other things, but he wasn't pure evil as defined by Satan. Evil is all of those things, but, most importantly, it is devoid of the idea that bad things are necessary for the betterment of one group over another. Evil is the opposite of good.
Why wasn't Hitler evil?
My basic argument against Hitler being evil is that Hitler did what he thought was good for the German/Austrian people. But let's look at the historical context first.
There are millions of little Hitlers running around in the world, but only rarely do the exact set of circumstances come together that allow one of them to thrive and so dominate a nation.
Hitler could have never succeeded without the Treaty of Versailles and the harsh penalties it placed on Germany after World War I. Hitler rose to power because the German people were looking for a strong leader to give them direction and make them great again. (Remember that nations generally believe in their natural superiority and right to exist.)
Hitler successfully did just that. He took back what the rest of the world had taken from Germany and then he did what many leaders have done in history, he took more. He believed in German/Austrian superiority and believed it should rightfully dominate the world.
His actions were incredibly destructive, heinous and had horrible consequences for whole races of people, especially Europe's Jewish population. But was he evil? And by evil remember the definition is "pure evil" as embodied by Satan. I say no.
And the reason is that one must consider environmental factors, without the right set of circumstances, Hitler would have been nothing more than a frustrated Austrian artist. Hitler did what was best, he thought, for the German/Austrian people. He lifted them up at a time when the rest of the world was profiting from their downfall.
Remember the Nixon defense: Any action is justifiable if done in the best interest of the country.
Nixon believed that the actions of the Plumbers was righteous because, as president, he was doing what he thought was best for the country. He knew he broke the law, but breaking the law was OK if you're president. Being president, or any kind of leader, gives you mandate to do what you think is best for the group. "Absolute power corrupts absolutely."
My point here (I know I ramble) is that our actions, the actions of our leaders have long-term consequences on the world. We do things in our personal best interest, both as individuals and nations, that change the future for the entire world. And, for the most part, we completely deny responsibility.
Ever sleep with someone else's girlfriend and later have that person hunt you down and beat the hell out of you for messing up their life? Same thing on a grand scale. Putting one's self interest above the interest of another. Selfishness. Human nature.
Now I'm really going to piss people off.
By the same token I don't think Bin Laden is evil.
Bin Laden could never have flourished if America was not hellbent on undermining Soviet Union influence in the world. Bin Laden most likely would have faded away if America would have helped rebuild Afghanistan after the withdraw of Russian troops in the 1980s.
And let's not even talk about why some in the Muslim world considers us the Great Satan. I would have a hard time defending our policies in the Middle East for the past 50 years.
There are plenty of ifs to argue over, but the fact remains that Bin Laden did not just rise from the pits of Hell bent on destroying the Judea/Christian world. He was created by a country that looked after its own best interests to the detriment of another group of people.
(Side note on Bin Laden: America will track down and kill him eventually and we will have to deal with his ideals and methods for generations. But you would think that the people who would most want to silence Bin Laden would be the moderate Muslims. I say this because Bin Laden's holy war on the West gives America and other Christian countries, and lets not forget the Jewish nation of Israel, justification for suppressing the Muslim faith and for dominating the region and its people.)
Other so called evil people:
Milosevic.
No, I will argue that Milosevic was a genius who took advantage of Serbian nationalism (and doesn't all of this come down to nationalism) and world indifference to enrich himself and attempt to create an empire. Nothing more than just another Hitler we allowed to get away with murder.
Bush. Or Lil' Bushy as he's supposedly called around the house (according to his daughters at the Republican convention in New York last week).
(Side note: Someone should write a book entitled: "Lil' Bushy Goes to War." It would be an instant best seller for the name alone.)
Bush is a true believer in American dominance and might makes right. He really believes he's making America stronger. The guy's delusional and surrounded by war mongers, but he's not evil. I'll accept stupid and dangerous, though.
Why does this discussion about what is evil matter? Consider this tirade from the opinion page of the Belfast Telegraph.
The difference being, that in Beslan, it wasn't machinery wearing out or breaking down which caused its notoriety, but the simple presence of evil.
And it was evil.
As clearly as in Belsen or Auschwitz or Treblinka, what happened in Beslan was systematic, deliberate, savoured, unprovoked and demonic.
No it wasn't.
Last week's horrible events at the school in Beslan came about because an extreme group of people felt they had to go to extreme measures to get their point across. They are murderers and many other terrible things, but they can justify their actions to themselves.
That is the difference. Self-justification. Be it delusional or simply insane. People do horrible things when they think they are either in the right or have no other choice.
Russia feels it is in the right to suppress Chechen independence and Chechen rebels feel desperate to make the point that they won't be silenced. Insert "America" and any Latin American country for Russia and Chechnya and you see the pattern.
Too often we throw out the word "evil" to explain why horrible things happen and all of a sudden it alleviates us of responsibility. And often to the justification of further atrocities as we seek revenge against those evil bastards over there.
On a lighter note, check this site out:
http://home.att.net/~slugbutter/evil/
I'm happy to say I was deemed neutral by the powers that be, whoever they are.
Recent Comments